JAMP vs Matomo

Matomo is a deep, mature, privacy-focused analytics suite you can self-host. JAMP trades raw feature depth for a tiny script and a managed setup, keeps analytics cookieless and banner-free, and adds uptime, errors and real-user vitals.

FeatureJAMPMatomo
Privacy-first analytics
No cookies, no consent bannerConfigurable
Open sourceNot yet
Self-hosting
Uptime monitoring
JS error tracking
Real-user Core Web VitalsLimited
Hosted status pages
Analytics script weight739 BTens of KB
Starting priceFree, then $5/moFree self-host, cloud from ~$26/mo

Why teams choose JAMP over Matomo

Lighter on the page

Matomo's tracker is tens of kilobytes. JAMP's analytics script is 739 bytes, so you get the data without the page-weight tax.

Monitoring is built in

Matomo focuses on analytics. JAMP adds uptime, source-mapped error tracking and real-user vitals in the same place.

Cookieless by default

JAMP never needs a consent banner. Matomo can be configured to reduce cookies, but the default often still prompts for consent.

In fairness

Matomo is deep and mature, with heatmaps, session recording and full GA-style reporting, and you can self-host it for free. If you want an exhaustive analytics suite and will run your own server, Matomo is hard to match on features.

Frequently asked questions

Is JAMP a lighter Matomo alternative?

Yes. JAMP's analytics tracker is 739 bytes versus Matomo's much larger script, and it adds uptime, errors and vitals without a server to run.

Is JAMP cookieless, unlike Matomo by default?

Yes. JAMP is cookieless by design, so it never needs a consent banner. Matomo can be configured to reduce cookies but often still prompts for consent.

When is Matomo the better choice?

If you want an exhaustive analytics suite with heatmaps and session recording and are happy to self-host, Matomo is hard to beat on raw features.

Ready to watch your whole site?

Start free in under 60 seconds. No credit card, no cookie banner.

Related reading: How to track Core Web Vitals