JAMP vs Sentry
Sentry is powerful for deep error and performance monitoring, but the SDK is heavy and the bill grows quickly. JAMP gives you source-mapped error tracking in a tiny script, alongside privacy-first analytics and uptime, for a fraction of the price.
| Feature | JAMP | Sentry |
|---|---|---|
| JS error tracking | ||
| Source map symbolication | ||
| Real-user Core Web Vitals | ||
| Privacy-first analytics | – | |
| Uptime monitoring | Add-on | |
| Hosted status pages | – | |
| Browser script weight | ~1.5 KB error, 739 B analytics | Tens of KB |
| Free tier | Yes | Limited |
| Starting price | Free, then $5/mo | From $26/mo |
Why teams choose JAMP over Sentry
Lighter on the page
Sentry's browser SDK is tens of kilobytes. JAMP's error script is around 1.5 KB and its analytics tracker is 739 bytes, so you get error tracking without the page-weight tax.
Errors and analytics together
Sentry is deep on errors but blind to who is actually on your site. JAMP pairs error tracking with privacy-first analytics and uptime in one dashboard.
Priced for small teams
Sentry gets expensive as volume climbs. JAMP starts free and stays affordable, with the monitoring suite included on every plan.
In fairness
Sentry is the gold standard for deep application error and performance monitoring, with rich tracing, integrations and release tooling. For large, backend-heavy teams who need that depth, Sentry goes further than JAMP.
Ready to watch your whole site?
Start free in under 60 seconds. No credit card, no cookie banner.